|
From time to time, questions are raised regarding the CWW registry
and how it is maintained. Since we have many new members I would like
to explain how CWW maintains records for the Chinook breed and the origins
of the modern Chinook registry.
After the rescue of the remaining 11 breedable Chinooks, breeding programs
began with each individual kennel maintaining their own records and
issuing certificates of pedigree. The first attempt to centralize these
records was by the Chinook Club of America in the mid 1980's. The CCOA
sent out questionnaires and began a computerized database of all known
Chinooks. This dated back to 1979 and included records from Kathy Adams
while the Chinooks were at Sukee Kennels.
The CCOA disassembled and the Chinook Owners Association began compiling
much of the same information from breeders and issuing certificates
of pedigree. Litter registration sheets were sent to breeders who filled
out these sheets and returned them to the COA registrar.
In 1993-1994 Chinooks Worldwide Inc. combined the records of the Sukee
Kennel and Northdown Kennel, Chinook Club of America, and Chinook Owners
Association. Northdown Kennel had not registered their Chinooks with
any agency but left behind all breeding records and sales receipts of
Chinooks. CWW also had access to Perry Greene's breeding records and
pedigrees. CWW therefore became the largest registering body for the
Chinook breed, encompassing all Chinooks from every known kennel. With
the assistance of Ritter Consulting these records were put in a commercial
pedigree program. CWW today maintains the practice of having breeders
fill out litter sheets, assigning a registration number, and issuing
a pedigree. This database has been used by various health professionals
assisting us to research health concerns within the breed.
In 1992 The Chinook Owners Association turned their registry over to
a private agency, the United Kennel Club. Many of the Chinooks from
Northdown Kennel and others in the CWW Registry were not included in
this foundation process. Breeders, the Acting COA Registrar, and the
myself submitted approximately 45 Chinooks from Northdown and other
Kennels such as Benjamins, Victors, and Backroads for inclusion in the
UKC Registry.
It is important to grasp how many Chinooks were whelped at the former
Northdown Kennel. Records indicate over 500 purebreds and crosses left
Northdown from 1986-1993. Northdown had a controversial practice of
allowing two sires to breed to one female. These breedings were recorded
in the Kennel records as dual sired. NONE of these breedings were submitted
to the UKC or included in the CWW registry. From over 500 Chinooks only
45 had acceptable records. Many of those 45 were spayed or neutered
and fewer than a dozen were breedable stock. Many transfers of ownerships
were available with pedigrees. Others were identified by previous owners
or those who were familiar with many of these Chinooks. Some became
UKC foundation stock, being issued registration numbers but sires and
dams were left blank. I participated with the COA Registrar in a UKC
Single Dog Registration Program to document many of these Chinook's
pedigrees. It was an enormous task utilizing litter records, breeder
records, and taking written statements from those who witnessed breedings
at any time at Northdown Kennel, with the kennel owner reconfirming
many of these breedings.
I maintain that the Chinooks Worldwide Inc. registry is just as complete
and accurate as any other domestic registry for any breed of dog.
During 1994-1995, with DNA testing in its infancy for identification
purposes, approximately a dozen registered Chinooks or dogs bred at
Northdown had their DNA collected. It was determined that the samples
may not have been immediately marked for identification, hands were
not cleaned in between taking samples, and a neutral third party was
not present to witness the process; thus allowing the potential for
mismarked or contaminated samples.
Rather than clarify, DNA results were inappropriately used to cast
a shadow of doubt over another kennel: North Wind Chinooks of Oregon.
Several Chinooks reported to be full siblings were found to have different
dams. Another sibling did not match the reported siblings. Though, PE
AgGen (now Celera AgGen) does not support the use of comparing sibling
DNA as an appropriate method of determining parentage. The parents of
these dogs were reported deceased and not available for DNA testing.
This created quite a dilemma for all Chinook owners. Suddenly we are
faced with "Is Fido Fido??" Breeding programs were well under way and
the pedigrees of almost every Chinook was involved.
The COA chose to divide siblings and make some foundation stock with
open pedigrees while others keeping their full pedigrees. In the end
it was the Board of the COA who decided what they felt was best for
the breed. This was their prerogative.
The Chinooks Worldwide Board and myself as Registrar faced the same
dilemma. These findings could place doubt as to the accuracy of any
Chinook Registry. The CWW Board agonized over these findings and the
potential inaccuracies of the sampling. In the end it was determined
that our registry was as accurate as documentation allowed and voted
to keep all historical pedigrees intact. Should we have sacrificed a
breed teetering on the edge of extinction or she we have moved forward?
The Board chose to go forward. Not unlike any other club struggling
to establish their breed, there had to be a definitive place to start
the Registry.
The Registrar acts much like a historian of the living history of the
Chinook breed. The information gathered in writing and documents available
are used to support pedigrees. Until DNA testing became available to
verify canine parentage we could only trust the word of the Breeder.
We did not want to disgrace or defame any kennel or owner and without
irrefutable evidence being submitted we have no right to change a pedigree.
Today we still maintain that our Registry is as accurate as humanly
possible.
But, what does one do when faced with scientific evidence that could
cast doubt on pedigrees? In 1996 the CWW Board chose not to accept the
results of DNA testing done on the dogs discussed earlier in this article.
They felt that the samples could have been contaminated or the sampled
dogs may not have been correctly identified. The results of the DNA
testing presented an impossible scenario because questionable sampling
equals questionable results. In order to prevent this situation from
happening again, a professional laboratory, Celera Agen was endorsed
to do all DNA testing and analysis. A forward moving mentality was accepted
for the use of DNA in our breed. All possible sires and dams of any
Chinook tested must be properly on file with Celera Agen. This is the
only accepted practice to positively verify parentage. You cannot collect
DNA from a Chinook and go shopping for a sire and dam or attempt to
use siblings to determine relations.
Occasionally errors in the registry are brought to my attention. Usually
they are minor, a misspelled name or the wrong date of birth. These
are easily corrected and owners need only send the correction in writing.
An updated pedigree is then issued.
If members believe there is a serious error, such as a contested sire
or dam, they need to present their concerns in writing with irrefutable
evidence provided. This supporting proof must be provided in documentation
that removes any shadow of doubt before a pedigree may be changed. If
any circumstances surround the pedigree that can not be resolved (as
deceased possible parentage) the pedigree may not be changed. All pedigrees
are presumed innocent until proven guilty. As well, CWW can only request,
not require owners to submit DNA from their dogs.
Are there questionable areas in our breed? Of course. From the origin
of our breed there are questions about which breeds combined to create
Walden's Chinooks. Perry Greene created even more mysticism surrounding
the dogs by maintaining sole control over the Chinook and keeping breedings
secret. There are many "lost" years in the history of our dogs. Though
we cannot go back in time to fill in these blanks we can use the documentation
we have to create a foundation and move forward. By using sound breeding
practices and encouraging breeders to DNA profile today's breeding stock
we can move into the future with reassurance that the Chinook will continue
to flourish and progress.
|